Nativity of the Lord

Nativitas D.N.I.C.
25 December 2023

  At Christmas and throughout the season, we celebrate the feast of the drawing near of God, of God’s coming closer to us.  Even though the most natural and immediate form of human communication is being with another, in his or her presence, sharing time with, and speaking with another, many decades of technological advancements have made the more remote, less personal, type of communication possible.  And not only is that less personal communication possible but, in some cases, dare we admit, more desirable?  Sort of revealing, the lesser angels of our nature.  That we are happy to keep people at a distance.  In addition, to these developments in communication, things have been turned upside down in recent years.  Fear of a global illness caused social distancing and greater space between us, impacting the natural draw and exchange in human relationships.                

But we celebrate the feast of the drawing near of God, of God’s coming closer to us.  In my mind, the meaning of that coming closer is an invitation to put a focus on that most natural way human beings communicate: being personally with another, in the presence of another, sharing time with and speaking directly with another, or just being with another in uncomplicated silence.  Perhaps we moderns, for all of our advantages, can actually suffer a disadvantage precisely due to our advantages.  We can communicate in so many ways and even when such great distances keep us physically apart.  We don’t have to pretend that such possibility isn’t a blessing.  But it can also mislead us.  Because we can communicate so freely and readily, even across great distances, we might be inclined to diminish the meaning of personal communication.  That, in turn, might cause us to miss some of what is at stake in this feast of the great drawing near of God in the flesh.

Though we have many ways to stay connected, there is something different and more natural and fluid about that most immediate communication when personally present with another.  I can recall my excitement years ago as a boy, awaiting the birth of my brother.  For several months I could see that he was near but I couldn’t see him.  I could see the signs in mom’s tummy that someone was there, but there was just enough distance that I couldn’t see him.  There was not much of a barrier between us, just a few inches of flesh, right, but it was enough to prevent that type of more normal personal interaction.  His birth changed all of that.  He had come nearer and that permitted interaction and communication that was entirely new.

Christmas is all about that coming near of God to us in the flesh.  As I think about how physical and personal nearness changes everything, and as I place that in the context of the spiritual life of faith, I see a connection for us to the practice of prayer.  The birth of God in our midst permits an interaction and a communication that is entirely new.  And here is where we moderns perhaps can fall prey to a risk, given all of our impressive means of communication across vast distances.  We miss the natural and immediate value and the necessity of personal time spent with another, such that we might tend to downplay it, preferring the spectacle of communicating across distances.  You can easily see this just about everywhere when you see folks together, in each other’s presence, but everyone’s face is bent down to a phone.  At a restaurant, I sometimes wonder about how we have lost an art of human living, when you see a couple together and each face is lit up by a screen for long periods, such that they rarely interact directly.

  Friends, God has come near to us.  He is Emmanuel, a name which means “God-with-us”.  He has drawn near and by His power as God that personal interaction, and relationship, and communication is possible if we practice it.  And, furthermore, that personal interaction, and relationship, and communication is necessary so that we come close to God in the gift of freedom He has given us.  If we celebrate Christmas, then we should not lose the lesson of developing that intimate, daily, regular encounter with the God who has drawn near to us.  I dare say, a Catholic could do all the group, corporate things we do as a Church, those things we have an obligation to do, but without a personal prayer life, such a person wouldn’t be getting very far in life with God.  In fulfillment of the Lord’s command at the Last Supper, “Do this in memory of me”, and in fulfillment of the divine law in the Ten Commandments to honor God on his day, we have the opportunity and the obligation to be at Mass every Sunday and every holy day.  Yet, I suggest that the catholic could fulfill those obligations yet not reap the full reward of grace if we are not seeking to advance in a daily life of prayer for which we take personal responsibility.  No, we can’t do without the group gathering at Holy Mass; but, even attending Mass, would remain shallow without the personal effort at prayer.  Many a catholic could show up at those times when a new sacrament is offered, only to disappear until the next one is offered.  While God is not cheap in His gift of grace in those sacramental moments, how stilted and undeveloped would those moments be if not for the personal effort to pray and to live that faith beyond just the moments when one “gets” something at Church?

Why would I say this?  Because the meaning of what we celebrate at Christmas is that God, in taking on our flesh and being born in time, has come near to us.  And He has come near so that we can remain near to Him.  There is simply nothing that really adequately replaces the value of being physically and personally with another and to share life.  By His power as God, although the Lord Jesus has fulfilled his physical mission on earth, he can and does remain personally present to us when we work at following the life of regular personal prayer.  Such personal prayer is like preparing the soil of our lives so that all the things we do as a group, all those normal obligations we fulfill corporately as Catholics, has a good place to be planted and to come to bear much fruit.  Prayer prepares the soil.  The Gospel passage (from St. Luke [for the Midnight Mass]) of the events surrounding the birth of Christ places it in a real historical time and place: naming figures like Caesar Augustus and Quirinius the Governor of Syria.  I don’t know about you, but I don’t have any relationship with them.  They are too far away across the bounds of history.  The closest I can get is to read about them on Wikipedia.  But God coming near in Jesus Christ is different!  Jesus is the good news of great joy proclaimed by the angel.  He is for all the people.  He is the Savior born for us.  He is the sign of a God who has come close so as to be wrapped in swaddling clothes and placed in the manger.  Our coming to adore Him is not just what we do here together, as critically important and irreplaceable as that is.  Our adoring of Him involves our equally drawing near to Him in our personal daily prayer wherever we are, in our coming to encounter Him in our adoration chapel, in our striving to be like Him in the moral life, and in our faithful practice of the sacramental life by which He deposits the grace of His life within us.  We must work at personal prayer.  We must be on guard such that modern communication methods don’t result in training us to keep a distance from God, our faces buried in screens and busy with so many things.  May our prayer place us in that posture of physical and personal encounter with God such that we proclaim His glory in the highest, and such that his favor may come to rest on us!

Second Sunday of Advent

Dominica II Adventus B
10 December 2023

 If you can recall how Advent started with last Sunday’s Gospel passage, you might be experiencing some “evangelical whiplash”.  A new liturgical year, a new season, began last Sunday with Advent.  Yet, that weekend’s Gospel was a selection more toward the end of St. Mark’s Gospel and maintained the theme of the coming judgement with the awaited return of the Lord in glory.  This Sunday’s Gospel selection sort of violently throws us back to the opposite pole of Advent.  The selection comes from the first verses of St. Mark’s Gospel and it seems more “advent-y” since we hear of the great Advent figure of St. John the Baptist, and the call to prepare the way of the Lord.  We are back to the beginnings with the Gospel selection this weekend and that can serve as a theme for us and the spiritual renewal we need in Advent to prepare anew the way of the Lord in our own daily lives, in our hearts, our minds, and our souls.

It is clear from the Gospel selection that something about St. John the Baptist’s location, his proclamation, and his appearance hit a nerve such that great numbers of people were coming out to him.  The Gospel tells us that St. John appeared “in the desert” and that he was baptizing people “in the Jordan River.”  The details of St. John’s location can serve as signals that pointed Jews of his time back to the Exodus.  When God began to execute that foundational saving event of the Exodus by bringing His people out of Egypt, where did the Hebrew people go?  They went out into the desert.  They journeyed there 40 years as God sought to train them to break their connection to Egypt, to be trained in His law, and to move away from slavery and toward the Promised Land.  And where did the Exodus end?  It ended at the Jordan River as the twelve tribes crossed the Jordan into the Promised Land.  We can say that the action of St. John is equivalent to calling Jews back to the beginnings of their foundational experience of salvation in the Exodus.  St. John’s preaching and administering of a baptism of repentance at the Jordan River can serve to call God’s people back to this pivotal place in their history and, at the same time, to announce that a new exodus is arriving.  This gospel scene is an opportunity for God’s people to be renewed in their covenant so that they are ready for how God will still fulfill His promises and more perfectly bring about redemption by the arrival of the “one mightier” than St. John, who is to come.  And no surprise, then, that if you read further into the Gospels after Jesus has engaged in his preaching and is nearing his arrival in Jerusalem for crucifixion, that event is marked by the imagery of Passover and exodus.  In fact, St. Luke in the Transfiguration account even indicates that Moses and Elijah appear alongside Jesus speaking to him about his exodus (Lk. 9:30-31).

The ministry of St. John called multitudes back to their beginnings to be renewed in repentance and the forgiveness of sins, so that they would be prepared for the new thing God desired to do by His sacrifice on the Cross and his passage, as through the Red Sea or the veil torn open in the Temple, ushering the way into the everlasting promised land of heaven.  The Gospel selection likewise serves as a call to us to return to our beginnings when we were brought out of slavery to sin, passing through the waters of baptism, and given the hope of crossing that final Jordan into heaven.  We exist in the time of the new exodus accomplished by Jesus.  We have been brought into that most perfect covenant of salvation in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.  We have been redeemed.  Yet, like God’s people returning time and again to the poison of Egypt, we are inclined to sin and struggle to remain alive and faithful to the New Covenant.  We also need to go back to our beginnings. We also need to hear the call to repentance.  We also need the forgiveness of our sins.  We also need to respond in great multitudes to this urgent Advent call to be prepared.  The Lord’s first arrival accomplished the salvation of the Cross and ushered in the power of the sacraments.  We need to remain in that covenant gift and we need to renew ourselves in that fountain of sacramental grace flowing from the Lord’s open side on the Cross so that we are prepared for the Lord’s return in glory and our final passage to the heavenly promised land.

With good reason the Church teaches us that one of the values of confession and sacramental absolution is that we are restored to baptismal grace (cf. CCC 1446).  We are called back to our beginnings in confession.  We are called back to that first gift of the forgiveness of sins.  After baptism we struggle with sin and we are inclined to sin.  After baptism, we commit sins for which we bear personal responsibility.  Such sins also need to be forgiven.  Like St. John’s ministry in today’s passage, we are called back to our beginnings in this holy season.  God is not done with us.  And we must prepare for His return in glory as Judge.  We pray so frequently, even daily, in the Lord’s Prayer, “forgive us our trespasses”.  How foolish it would be to make such a request but then to never return, or to rarely return, to our beginnings where Jesus has indicated his gift of forgiveness and mercy exists, where it is found, is heard with our ears, and where it is granted in the sacrament of confession.

The preaching of St. Peter in the second reading likewise proclaims this call to repentance and the coming day of judgment.  The Lord “is patient with you, not wishing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance.  But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a mighty roar and the elements will be dissolved by fire, and the earth and everything done on it will be found out…. Therefore, beloved, since you await these things, be eager to be found without spot or blemish before him, at peace.”

First Sunday of Advent

Dominica I Adventus B
3 December 2023

 The season of Advent calls us to prepare for the Lord.  It calls us to prepare to observe the Lord’s first arrival at Christmas.  Advent also insists that we do not take our focus off of the arrival we still await: the Lord’s return in glory.  This season calls us to prepare space in our lives and to prepare time each day to be with the Lord.  Advent gives us the opportunity in alert, quiet prayer and in repentance from sin to be prepared to meet the Lord.   The type of preparation that disciples do is not narrowly focused only on arriving at some important event, like Christmas Day or Judgement Day.  Rather, the preparation of disciples has a broader focus.  It is a focus on living the faith now consistently; it is a focus on being prepared so as to be ready for some future event; and it is a focus on living beyond that event.  This broader focus may explain in part why at this time of year Catholics celebrate our Christmas joy only after Advent preparations, and why we continue to celebrate our Christmas joy well beyond Christmas Day; whereas, the world has mostly focused on the date of December 25th and has in large part already thrown out the Christmas Tree on December 26th.

This broader focus of Catholic preparation should be familiar to us.  We observe this broader focus all the time, so that we live beyond the event we are preparing for.  We have a time of preparation before baptism so that baptism is understood not merely as a cultural marker or as a static moment, but as a dynamic change of life that requires one to live baptismal commitments long after the wet hair has dried.  When children are preparing for their First Confession and First Holy Communion, it should be clear they are preparing to live those sacraments well beyond the first reception.  A catholic comes again and again to confession so that a catholic can more worthily receive again and again the great gift of the Holy Eucharist in Holy Communion.  Confirmation is not a graduation from living the faith.  It comes as the culmination of first living the faith.  And it is a gift of grace to be strong in being a witness to the Lord as a disciple more united to the mission of the Church.  The final example I’ll offer to demonstrate that a disciple is called to a broad view of preparation is the example of marriage.  I hope I can state with 100 percent agreement that no one would approach marriage with that more narrow view of preparation that focuses only on the wedding day.  Couples engage in marriage preparation for an extended period of time ahead of marriage such that they are strengthened to make their commitments, such that they arrive at the joyful event of the wedding day maximally prepared, and so that they live beyond the event, beyond just the day.  Disciples prepare in such a way to be focused to live a life of commitment in holy matrimony until death do they part.

In fact, as of now I can’t think of any important preparation we do as disciples that is really only about a narrow focus on a moment or an event, or a date on the calendar.  It is all about preparing in advance for an event that we are called to live beyond one solitary moment.  My examples of the type of broad preparation that a disciple must undertake have all been on the sacraments.  I chose that because I think it is familiar and easily understood.  But the point of this is to accept this template of broad preparation and to refer it back to the Gospel and the warnings we hear from the Lord about preparing for his arrival.  Our preparation to be ready to meet the Lord when he comes again must begin now.  Preparing now means we grow in our commitments as a disciple in the present.  In so doing, we gradually and increasingly become the type of disciple who is prepared for that unknown day and hour of the Lord’s return.  By taking up this broader view of preparation as regards the coming judgment, we are then living in a way that has us alert, watchful, and ready for the Lord.  And if that is the case, then we have hope to live beyond the event of his return, for our focus must also be the life to come after judgment.

The gift of Advent comes perhaps when we most need it.  It comes at a time of year that tends to be very hectic.  The advent call to a robust and broad preparation for the Lord comes when stores have us focusing on Christmas since September, with the risk that a focus on the return of the Lord in glory is almost totally eclipsed, so inundated are we about December 25th.  The gift of Advent comes to us in a culture marked heavily by Protestantism, some popular forms of which like to calculate the end times in a narrow focus given mostly to the event of the Lord’s return.  But our focus needs to be broadly on living now and living well our life in the Lord so that we are alert when the event happens, and ready to live beyond it as the Lord ushers in his kingdom.  I always find it curious when a well-meaning Christian spends a good amount of time figuring out the signs of the times and seeming to calculate them.  That is curious because it is directly contrary to God’s Word.  In fact, the very verse before today’s Gospel passage has Jesus indicate that “of that day or hour, no one knows, neither the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father”.  Not even the Son knows!  It is the Father’s secret.  In view of preparing for that arrival of the Lord we still await, the Lord does not want calculation but… “vigilation” – you know, to be vigilant!  In the brief Gospel passage we heard it several times: Be watchful!  Be alert!  Don’t be found sleeping.  Watch!  Only a broadly viewed preparation that begins now adequately addresses that call of the Lord.  The call of the Gospel can serve as an examination of conscience for us.  Are there areas where I am not accepting the teaching of Christ and his Church?  Areas where I am holding onto some opinion or popular thought that is not consistent with authentic Catholicism?  If so, then I am asleep.  Are there areas where my moral choices are not consistent with living well my life in the Lord here and now?  If so, then I am asleep.  Are there areas where I do not practice the sacramental life as I should, leaving myself void of the grace that is the Lord’s gift for my preparation?  If so, then I am asleep.  Is there always time for so many things except a meaningful and vibrant daily prayer life?  If so, then I am asleep.  “May he not come suddenly and find you sleeping.  What I say to you, I say to all: ‘Watch’!”

Thirty-Second Sunday in Ordinary Time

Dominica XXXII per Annum A
12 November 2023

 The selection of St. Matthew’s Gospel comes from the section offering parables about watchfulness and preparedness for the coming judgment.  In this parable, Christ is the Bridegroom, the virgins are an image for the community of believers, an image for disciples, and the oil for lamps is an image of goodness or the performance of good works that should mark the disciple’s life.  After all, elsewhere in St. Matthew, at the Sermon on the Mount, we hear that good deeds are like the light of a lamp that must shine before others (cf. Mt. 5:16).  By showcasing in this passage the foolishness of going out to meet the bridegroom without preparing, the gospel calls us to be prepared and to consider whether our actions match up with our stated intentions to be disciples.  Are we ready to meet Christ the Bridegroom and to enter Heaven, imaged as a wedding feast?  Only those who are ready will enter.  As the gospel describes, “those who were ready went into the wedding feast…. Then the door was locked.”  Are we foolish and unprepared?  Are we carrying enough oil (good works)?

Our Catholic faith teaches us about the origin and the meaning of things in our world, and how to live well in this world.  Our faith also tells us about our end in this world and our destination beyond this life.  Thus, our Catholic faith highlights what are called the Four Last Things.  These four last things are death, judgment, Heaven, and Hell.  Let’s examine them briefly.  Being aware of our ultimate end goal can help us take the next step to be focused on the steps to get there.  I’m going to reorder the typical listing so that we end on a more hopeful note with Heaven.

    Death

    Death is a consequence of Original Sin.  Death is the event whereby the soul separates from the body; the soul lives on because it is immortal, while the body decomposes.  The soul is immediately judged and is rewarded with Heaven, punished with Hell, or sent for a time of cleansing to Purgatory prior to final arrival in Heaven.  We should always live as ready for death since, for the most part, none of us knows when, where, or how we will die.  Being aware of death and reflecting frequently upon it can give us impulse to avoid sin.  How foolish if we prepare our temporal, worldly affairs, by means of a last will and testament, but we leave our soul unprepared and open to being picked over and looted by agents of the kingdom of darkness and eternal death.  For people of Christian faith bodily death is not the end.  And death is not the greatest enemy.  Let me say that again: for people of Christian faith, death is not the greatest enemy.  Rather, the greatest enemy is a death for which we are unprepared since it may carry the consequence of an eternal death of the soul.  For this reason, a wise devotion in our Catholic practice encourages us to pray that the Lord spare us from what is called an “unprovided death”.  An “unprovided death” means a death that comes upon us suddenly and for which we are unprepared and found lacking because we have neglected our soul, we are not in a state of grace due to not having confessed our sins, and we have no recourse to the Sacraments at the time our end comes.

   Judgment

   Immediately after our death we believe we experience a judgment before Christ that is called the Particular Judgment.  It is called ‘particular’ because it is individual and comes to each of us at the particular moment when our death arrives.  The soul’s eternal destiny is decided and established at the Particular Judgment.  The soul that dies in baptismal innocence, that is, in a perfect state of grace, and having satisfied and repaired for the sins he has committed, experiences the eternity of Heaven directly.  The soul that dies in mortal sin experiences the eternity of Hell directly.  The soul that dies in the general state of grace but imperfectly so, that is, being guilty only of lesser sins, or needing to atone for the temporal punishment due to sins already confessed and forgiven, such a soul experiences the final purification of mercy in the temporary “place” we call Purgatory.  We should note that Purgatory is a temporary “place” leading eventually to entrance into Heaven.  Wisdom calls us to live each day in preparation for the judgment that will come after death.  Our prayer life, our service to others, our voluntary penances, our frequent confessions and worthy Holy Communions are all ways we seek to have enough oil for our lamps as we go to meet the Lord.  We also express belief in a judgment that is called the General, or the Universal, Judgment.  Unlike the Particular Judgment that comes to each soul individually, the General Judgment will be that day when the Lord returns at the end of the world.  At that time, he will call all the dead to rise, bringing new life to our separated bodies.  At the General Judgment we will experience the judgment we received at our death, only now as souls united to a resurrected body, experiencing bodily the glory and joys of Heaven or the pains of Hell.

       Hell

       The Book of Revelation teaches us that nothing unclean, nothing with the stain of sin, and no one who practices abomination and falsehood can enter God’s presence (Rev. 21:27).  Sin and God cannot coexist.  For this reason, our faith teaches us that the serious sin we call “mortal” separates us from God.  And, if we die with unrepented mortal sin, even just one, we are destined for Hell.  Hell is an eternal existence of separation from God, awareness of our foolishness in squandering God’s blessings, and an existence of torment and punishment.  The words of Scripture and of Christ himself describe Hell as a ‘place’ of unquenchable and everlasting fire, a bottomless pit, everlasting punishment, a lake of fire, and the outer darkness.  This truth of faith that sin offends God and deserves punishment is not unfair; rather, it is an expression of truth and justice.  There is no true justice if wrongdoing is not punished.  Likewise, on the flip side, there is no true justice if good doing is not rewarded.  Both are needed as expressions of authentic justice.  We should remember after all that, in God’s goodness, we are not required to remain in sin.  He has died to save us and He gives us every good thing so that we can be fully alive in Him.  God does not desire to send us to Hell.  That should give us confidence and hope.  Going to Hell would be our fault, not God’s.

         Heaven

         The eternal life of blessing and communion with God, described as a great wedding feast, is heaven.  Heaven is God’s full desire for us and it is the fulfillment of our desire too, because we have been made for God.  Those who die in the perfect state of grace or who, being in an imperfect state of grace have been purified in Purgatory, will enjoy perfect and everlasting happiness with God and all the angels and saints who worship around Him.  In Heaven the blessed enjoy the greatest gift and fulfillment of seeing God as He is.  This Beatific Vision of God refers to an active knowing and loving of God to our fullest capacity.  And it refers to being known and loved by God in return.  This is the destiny God desires for us and He has left nothing undone to provide this for those who are wise in being prepared.

The Collect of this Holy Mass states that we may be “unhindered” to pursue the things of God.  Are we truly unhindered if we aren’t prepared, if our souls aren’t ready to have the obstacle of sin removed from us?  In the psalm we prayed, “My soul is thirsting for you, O Lord my God.”  Does our preparedness reveal a real thirst for God, a real longing?  We are called to be prepared as people who have hope.  We are not called to an anxiety-filled preparation.  We have hope because of the Lord’s goodness.  He has told us in advance to stay awake and to prepare.  He has given us time to do so.  Furthermore, by his passion and resurrection, and the outpouring of his grace that comes to us in prayer and the Sacraments, he has given us all the gifts and tools necessary to be prepared.  If we say we are going to Heaven and if we say we desire Jesus, then let’s be wise about it before the door is locked.  For at a day and an hour we cannot know the cry will go out: “Behold, the bridegroom!  Come out to meet him!”

Twenty-Ninth Sunday in Ordinary Time

Dominica XXIX per Annum A
22 October 2023

You’ve heard the phrase: Politics makes for strange bedfellows.  If you need a break from the strange bedfellows keeping the US Congress from being able to elect a Speaker of the House… then this gospel passage gives you a brief diversion.  In the gospel we have the strange bedfellows of the Pharisees and the Herodians.  The Pharisees view Roman occupation of Judea as an abomination and the Herodians adopt a more cooperative stance with living in the gentile Roman world.  Yet, these two groups come together in a very charged exchange with Jesus by which the Pharisees attempt to entrap the Lord in this well known dilemma of paying the census tax to Caesar or not.  The Gospel passage makes clear that the Pharisees are motivated by malice toward the Lord and they are seeking to test him and to entrap him.  They butter him up with flattery, “Teacher, we know that you are a truthful man and that you teach the way of God in accordance with the truth.  And you are not concerned with anyone’s opinion.”  They ask: “Is it lawful to pay the census tax to Caesar or not?”  Now, this may not strike us as a really charged exchange, but it definitely is in the time of the Lord, for if the Lord answers “yes, it is lawful” then he will incite uproar among the Pharisees and their ilk by seeming to condone cooperation with Roman occupation.  If he says “no, it is not lawful” then he will be inspiring a tax revolt against Rome.  Rome historically dealt ferociously with such rebellions.

The ingenious response from the Lord is to ask for a coin that is used to pay the census tax.  Curiously, the Rome-rejecting Pharisees easily produce such a coin.  I guess they are more than willing to use the coin despite their protestations and religious purity.  In any event, we can learn a profound lesson by how the Lord dissolves their trap.  The Roman denarius coin bears the “ikon”, the Greek biblical text says, bears the “image” of Caesar, in this case the Emperor Tiberius Caesar.  The Pharisees and the Herodians easily identify that the coin bears the image and the inscription of Caesar.  The coin belongs to him, to the Empire.  The Lord then shifts the conversation away from the notion of cooperating in the tax.  Instead, the Lord maneuvers to make the focus about giving to someone what belongs to him.  In this case, Jesus says to give to Caesar what is his.

The Roman coin is stamped with the image of its owner, the one who has authority over it.  Jesus says to repay to Caesar what belongs to him. But he goes on to say, “and [repay] to God what belongs to God.”  Thinking about this Gospel image, we have a coin with the ikon, the image of Caesar.  It belongs to Caesar and should be given back to him.  But if we are to repay to God what belongs to Him, this begs a question: Where is God’s image? Where is it stamped so that we repay that “coin” back to Him?

In escaping their trap, the Lord teaches us a profound lesson about ourselves and about giving to God what He is owed.  And to grasp that we need to rest on the foundation of all that has preceded in the revelation of faith.  The Book of Genesis tells us a truth of creation.  In creation man is made, we are made, in God’s image and likeness.  Human persons are ikons of God.  Our faith tells us that, though we never lose the dignity of being made in God’s image, our likeness (that is, our “appearance”) is marred by the Fall, by the Original Sin we each inherit.  Though the image remains, our likeness to that image, our likeness to God, is disfigured by sin.  Our fallen nature, brought about by that first grave sin in the garden, carries the consequence of eternal separation from God.  By faith and baptism, our original holiness is restored, and the obstacle that bars our entrance to heaven is removed.  Thus, that is at least one reason why it is so important to be baptized, and quickly.  It’s a large part of why we baptize infants in our Catholic practice.  And so, I have some bad news for you, your kids are cute and all, but until they are baptized they are little pagans whose likeness to God has been disfigured!  That’s not so cute when it comes to heaven.  What about after baptism?  When in ongoing weakness we disfigure ourselves by sin, by the personal sins for which we bear guilt, confession restores our baptismal dignity long after we have been washed by the waters of regeneration.  And so, I have some bad news for us, we might look like disciples, but we are counterfeit “coins” for as long as God’s likeness is not visible in us, and not healed by confession.  When we commit sin and refuse the importance of confession we are fraudulent images.  In this, we aren’t giving back to God what belongs to Him.  In fact, God doesn’t accept sin as repayment for stamping us with His image.

This Gospel exchange takes place in the heated atmosphere of Jesus’ final days before he would lay down his life to pay all for us and for our salvation.  His words teach us of our innate dignity: that by God’s generous love He has stamped us with His own image, the image of His glory, giving us freedom, giving us the ability to use our minds, and to receive and to return His love.  And a repayment is expected.  The first reading teaches clearly that there are no other gods before the one true God.  We can’t make payment to idols, to other gods, and still have credit with the one true God.  The Gospel and the psalm tell us to give glory and honor to God, to give to Him what He is owed.  Living the life of faith and holiness guards our proper image and likeness and is the payment that gives to God what belongs to Him.  St. Paul says in his Letter to the Romans, “For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord” (6:23).

Sin mars the likeness of our image to God.  And sin is not the form of payment God accepts; it is not giving to God what belongs to Him.  The good news is that He Himself has paid the price to heal our sin.  In guarding our likeness to Him by faith and by striving personally for moral conduct, by using prayer and the helps He gives us in the sacraments, we are helping to populate the great census of Heaven.  By repaying to God what belongs to God, He pays greater dividends still by admitting us to eternal life in the Kingdom of His glory.

Twenty-Seventh Sunday in Ordinary Time

Dominica XXVII per Annum A
8 October 2023

 The parable of the wicked tenants is one of the Lord’s final parables before his passion, death, and resurrection.  In context, the Lord is speaking this parable in Jerusalem and in the face of mounting tension and opposition as factions seek to find ways to get rid of him.  Since we have heard a few parables lately, I think it is helpful to first recall this context and to recall to whom the Lord is speaking.  This parable takes place after the Lord cleanses the temple and curses the fig tree that did not have fruit, so we can observe that there are some dramatic things going on surrounding this parable.  After those episodes, the Lord returns to the Temple and the chief priests and the elders of the people, the religious authorities, are there and they want to know by what authority he is doing these things.  So, we learn in context, that the parable we hear today is directed to the religious leaders of the Jewish people.  To them, and not to a generic group or to the crowds, the Lord speaks this parable of the wicked tenants and the vineyard.  This parable sets up a confrontation with authority.  The Lord is speaking to the Jewish priests and religious leaders. He is speaking to them in the Holy City Jerusalem.  And he is speaking to them in the Temple.  That’s like putting several exclamation points on the notion of confrontation with authority.

We learn something of the background here by being aware of the prophecy of Isaiah, in which he uses the same image of a vineyard eight centuries earlier.  In fact, the Lord is making a direct reference to the prophecy of Isaiah in his use of this parable.  We heard that earlier prophecy of Isaiah in the first reading.  In it we find that God is the owner and lover of a vineyard for which He does everything so that it produces good fruit.  In Isaiah we learn that the vineyard is the people of Israel and also Jerusalem, the inhabitants of the Holy City.  Isaiah is here prophesying about the failure of the people of Israel to produce the good fruit of covenant relationship with God.  In producing wild grapes instead of good, that is, the bitter grapes of sin and lack of fidelity, Isaiah prophesies about the destruction of Jerusalem, this privileged place of encounter with God.

In referencing this parable, the Lord is not merely using a familiar image of agriculture.  He, like Isaiah, is offering a stinging indictment of the failure of the Holy City, its inhabitants, the people of Israel to produce the good grapes of holiness.  And the Lord is taking it right to the top by this confrontation with the religious leaders of the nation of Israel, the vineyard, from which God demands a good harvest for a worthy vintage.  With the Old Testament background in mind we can identify that this parable speaks of God as the vineyard owner.  He demands a yield of good fruit from his vineyard, that is from His people Israel.  He goes to great length to prepare his vineyard and to protect it such that there should be no reason it would not produce good fruit.  He sends his servants to announce the time of harvest and these can serve as an image of the prophets.  In all this we learn that Jesus is accusing the Jewish religious authorities of being the wicked tenants, who do their own thing with the vineyard, who yield bitter grapes, and who reject and kill the prophets and even the Son himself.  And that’s the twist of this parable.  That God would send His own Son to arrogant wicked tenants who are not serving His purposes for the precious vineyard, but who are doing their own thing with a vineyard that is not their own.  In this we have another lesson of the reckless generosity of God who goes to great lengths and does everything necessary such that His people will produce the fruit He requires and demands.  He sends His own Son knowing that he likewise will be rejected and killed, but he will become the chief cornerstone of the Kingdom.  The chief priests and the elders know that Jesus is speaking this parable about them.  If you read the whole passage you find just two verses after today’s passage this line: “When the chief priests and the Pharisees heard his parables, they perceived that he was speaking about them.”

Born within the Jewish people, Jesus is the faithful Israel.  He establishes a new Kingdom, a new covenant.  This takes place in his Church called together from Israel and from all nations.  Thus, taking all this imagery together we should note this progression: The vineyard is the house of Israel.  The house of Israel is fulfilled in the Church.  Thus, the vineyard is the Church.  The Church is the fulfillment of that precious vineyard that belongs to God the Father, from which He demands the good fruit of holiness, and to which He sends His own beloved Son who dies for our salvation such that nothing should prevent us from producing that required fruit.  Nothing, that is, but our own arrogance and refusal in freedom to belong to the vineyard and to do what God demands.

We live in a time of immense arrogance.  Man places himself in the center of the universe, in the center of all things, and makes himself the reference point for whatever he wants to be true – even when that is a lie.  Fallen and arrogant man decides that things around himself must change and conform to what makes him feel whole and complete.  He foolishly says, it is not I who must change but it is the order of the world and even Christ’s teaching that must convert to me.  Sadly, even people who should know better fall right in line with this way of thinking and acting.  As predicted in 2 Timothy 4:3-4, “For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander into myths.”  Today’s parable of the Lord is a direct confrontation with the religious authorities of the vineyard that is the house of Israel.  It doesn’t take much imagination to find a direct application to the religious authorities of the fulfillment of the vineyard that is the Church.  We live in a time of great confusion, arrogance, and cynicism.  With so much instantaneous mass communication you likely are painfully aware of the silly, confusing, and stupid things that even some of the Church’s religious leaders speak.  I know many of you are aware of this and you worry.  You are bombarded with feeling like leaders who should be helping you save your souls and helping you raise your children in salvation are working against you.  I can’t but conclude that our time is not much different in needing the confrontation that our Blessed Lord leveled against some of the top leaders of his time.  We have some wicked tenants in the vineyard.  I wish it was not so.  But it seems it is.  And the Lord has still laid down his life for us.  And we are not going to abandon him, even if some leaders seem bent on destroying the good grapes and planting seeds that are going nowhere but to destruction.  Take heart!  The stone rejected by the builders is the corner stone and it is wonderful in our eyes!  What did we hear in the second reading?  “Have no anxiety at all, but in everything, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, make your requests known to God.  Then the peace of God that surpasses all understanding will guard your hearts and minds in Christ Jesus” (Phil. 4:6-7).

We hear this parable in the month dedicated to the Holy Rosary.  My brothers and sisters, we can’t be unaware and we won’t be naïve about the wolves in sheep’s clothing that cause us suffering in the vineyard.  But that doesn’t mean that giving excessive focus to the crop of wild grapes becomes virtuous or wise either.  Spending too much of our time and energy in the echo chamber of gossip, watching YouTube videos, and reading blogs (even those that rightfully expose the empty talk that confuses us in our time) will not result in peace and a good harvest that God demands from us.  Even when it is a matter of hearing good teachers refute the bad teachers of our time, how many times – really?! – how many times do we need to hear the same good argument refuting the nonsense that disturbs us?  Again, we shouldn’t be unaware of the false teachers and we shouldn’t be unware of the good arguments that refute them.  However, how much time are we willing to give to unite ourselves in relationship to God?  Only that will save us and lead us to be good grapes.  For every time I am ready to hit play on the next YouTube video from that good priest, or for every time I am ready to type in the web address of that blog that speaks the authentic truth, am I willing instead to pray, to go to adoration to be with the Lord, to pick up the Rosary?  In this month of the Rosary, I want to challenge you to a new dedication to that prayer, a real weapon for our times.  Get here early to Mass and join in its public recitation.  If you don’t pray it at home, turn off the television and get doing that as a family.  Do it often, even daily.  If you have even just 20 minutes in a car ride, you have time to pray the Rosary.  You men and fathers had best be the ones taking the lead in making this happen in your families, to protect the vineyard of the domestic Church.  If there is resistance and complaining, who cares!  You lead.  Be the priest of your home and speak with your wife about age-appropriate ways to pray as a family.  Pray for the Pope and for our bishop.  Pray for all the bishops, no matter whether you think they are the good ones or the bad ones.  They need our prayers.  Only prayer and relationship with God will afford us peace in our times and only that will save us when the vineyard owner finally comes and puts those wicked tenants to a wretched death.  Our Lady is the premier model of faith and discipleship and of producing good fruit.  Pray for us, oh Holy Mother of God!  That we may be made worthy of the promises of Christ!

Twenty-Fourth Sunday in Ordinary Time

Dominica XXIV per Annum A
17 September 2023

Last weekend’s readings instructed us about the difficult work of confronting error and sin.  This is a work we are called to do and which we must do with the mind of Christ, with the approach of charity (or love).  When we must face the need to repent, when we ourselves are called to repent and change, we must not harden our hearts to that movement of God’s grace, to the call of His voice.  This weekend’s readings continue that theme, reminding us that mercy and forgiveness should mark our Christian life.  Our faith stretches us and challenges us to live by higher standards than the secular world proposes.

The readings today tell us that we cannot suffer any illusions about being Christian if we refuse to forgive and to show mercy to others.  The first reading describes a way of being and acting that is not of God.  Unfortunately, it also describes a way of being and acting for which Christians at times try to make excuses.  But no such excuses exist in God.  The first reading said, “Wrath and anger are hateful things, yet the sinner hugs them tight.  The vengeful will suffer the Lord’s vengeance….”  “Could anyone nourish anger against another and expect healing from the Lord?  Could anyone refuse mercy to another like himself, can he seek pardon for his own sins?”  Even we who are believers make excuses for our behavior, while condemning the behavior of others.  As God’s Word tells us: to the degree that we hug wrath and anger to ourselves, we are not living in God.  To the degree that we nourish anger and refuse mercy, we are really preventing ourselves from experiencing the mercy we need from God, if we are to be saved from a merciless Hell of our own making.

Jesus adopts this wisdom of the Old Testament and teaches that we must reflect God’s mercy if we belong to God.  Jesus’ teaching also erodes any false notions that we can be true Christians while mercilessly harboring lack of civility, lack of charity, and anger toward another.  Such behavior will not breed God’s life in us.  Instead it will breed death and eternal destruction.  Jesus teaches this by showing us the wicked servant who refuses to forgive a fellow servant’s debt, even though his own debt had just been wiped clean.  Jesus’ teaching tells us that it cannot be this way in his kingdom, the Church, because it cannot and will not be this way when his kingdom comes in its fullness in Heaven.  In the gospel, Peter thinks he’s being generous by offering to forgive seven times.  Jesus indicates his disciples must forgive seventy-seven times.  The reference to sevens is a way of indicating fullness or completeness, of saying that his disciples must extend God’s mercy and forgiveness many times – even every time.

Surely there is some catch here.  Surely there is some way around this, right?  No.  Not if one belongs to Christ.  Jesus warns that we cannot and will not be forgiven if we are unwilling to forgive others.  Jesus tells us clearly that we must be merciful as our Father is merciful.  And St. Paul explains why this is so.  He writes, “None of us lives for oneself…. If we live, we live for the Lord…. we are the Lord’s.”  We have been given the Father’s mercy at the price of the precious Blood of His only Son, Jesus our Lord.  If we take that gift, but hold onto wrath and anger, refusing to forgive others, then we make a mockery of the cost of the Blood of Christ.  We call cheap what is the most precious Blood of Jesus.

We must combat this tendency of our fallen nature to make excuses for anger, wrath, and vengeance.  These excuses show we rule our lives by sin instead of the grace of God.  When we hug wrath and anger to ourselves, when we hold on to that, we actually are hugging dysfunction, unhappiness, and eternal death all the closer.  It is a grand challenge to truly live as a Christian, aware of our own need to confess, repent, and experience God’s mercy, so that we can extend that mercy to others.  In our time many Christians live day after day in grave sin, compounding evil upon themselves because they refuse to experience God’s mercy in confession, or they rarely do so.  People sometimes say they don’t like confession, or they don’t come because they are nervous about telling a priest their sins.  This may be partially true.  But it may be more likely that people who stay away from confession perhaps recognize the hypocrisy in coming to the sacrament to expect forgiveness from God while they hold onto anger against others.  Perhaps infrequent practice of confession in our time is actually a sign that we need to form our lives around today’s readings, being willing to put away debts so that we can get on with the critical work of having our own debts forgiven.  We only have so much time to live according to God’s Word.  The first reading wisely reminds us: “Remember your last days, set enmity aside; remember death and decay, and cease from sin!”

Twenty-Second Sunday in Ordinary Time

Dominica XXII per Annum A
3 September 2023

  I think it is important to keep in mind last week’s Gospel selection as we consider this week’s selection.  The two selections belong together.  They are sequential.  What we just heard from St. Matthew’s Gospel follows immediately upon what we heard from St. Matthew last week.  In last Sunday’s selection, the Lord asked his disciples to report who people think he is and then to report who they say he is.  Speaking for the group, Peter had a triumphant moment by professing correct faith that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God.  In this triumphant profession of correct doctrinal faith Jesus says that Peter is a rock.  He is a large firm foundation upon which the Church will be built.

Following upon that correct profession of faith, in this weekend’s Gospel selection, the disciples – and we – learn still more.  We learn that another key aspect of having a firm foundation is living the correct faith and observing what it means to be a disciple, to be a student, who cannot make up his own moral foundation and teaching, but who must follow behind the Master.  This aspect of living the faith of a disciple goes hand-in-hand with the correct statement of doctrine, a correct faith.  What we believe matters.  And how we live matters.  These two weekend Gospel selections give us a fuller picture of the type of rock-solid foundation we need.  And what we learn this weekend about believing in Jesus and following him is that discipleship involves suffering.  We must change after all; and that is rarely easy or pleasant.

So important is this connection between correct doctrinal faith and the living of it, that following up his moment of triumph in last weekend’s selection, Peter has a particularly cringe-worthy and embarrassing low point in today’s selection.  The Lord instructs that he must go to Jerusalem where he will suffer greatly from the religious authorities and be killed.  This was not the idea that Peter and the others had in mind for the fulfillment of God’s promises of a Christ, a Messiah.  And so, Peter tries to reject the suffering that goes hand in hand with the Lord’s mission, and that goes hand-in-hand with being a disciple.  Peter pulls the Lord aside and rebukes him.  He pushes back on the teaching of suffering.  He rejects it.  He sort of wags his finger at Jesus and says, “Now, now, that wasn’t our expectation.  You need to agree with what makes sense to us.”  And Peter who had been given that name of “rock” just moments before now gets a new name: “Satan”.  The Lord firmly rebukes Peter.  And we need to hear that strong rebuke for what it is: “Get behind me, Satan!  You are an obstacle to me.”  A quick side note of interest: the Greek word for “obstacle” is a reference to a stone that causes one to stumble.  So, when Peter understands his proper place behind Jesus, that is, following Jesus, he can serve as the large rock-solid foundation stone of the Church.  But when Peter presumes to correct the Lord or to try to be the one who leads Jesus, he serves only to be a small stumbling stone.  When Peter presumes to lead Jesus, he in fact ceases to be a disciple.  The Gospel tells us that Peter and Jesus had been speaking to one another apart from the others.  When the Lord prepares to deliver his rebuke, “Get behind me, Satan”, the Gospel says that Jesus turned, meaning that he was physically putting Peter in his proper place; he was putting Peter behind him, where a disciple can actually be a disciple because he is in the place to actually follow the Master.

What does this passage, together with last Sunday’s, do for us?  Do we attempt the same failed method of discipleship that Peter attempted?  Do we maybe say the right things about being a Christian disciple, meanwhile we reject living what that means?  Do we sort of “rebuke” Jesus’ manner of showing us the way, the truth, and the life, by choosing our own way?  Do we reject some aspects of what our life ought to look like, how our life ought to be lived, while claiming to be a Christian?  Do we seek to take the lead away from Jesus and his Church by determining our own standards for living the faith?  Would there be any evidence if we were charged with saying the right things about the Lord (professing the correct faith) yet not living the way a disciple should live?  A significant area of life for our review, related to this passage is the following: Do I reject the difficulty that comes with converting, changing my life, and following behind the Lord?  Do I make excuses for my sin?  Are there things about being a disciple that I refuse to accept?  What inconsistencies in my life must I “die” to, so that I am not facing off with the Lord trying to tell him how things ought to be?

  Some specific examples may help our examination of conscience.  Am I the type of disciple who is here to use and to take, but I rarely give?   Do I think that being “busy” is a good excuse for laxity in prayer?  Because prayer can be difficult, does that absolve me from the struggle of dying to self and being with the Lord?  When I want to spend hours watching TV or surfing the internet, will I admit that I must die to those desires in order to make time to be with the Lord in prayer?  Would people who know me well be surprised if my social media profile indicates that “God is my all” or that the “Bible is my favorite book,” or that “I’m catholic”?  Do I justify my own morality in my use of the internet and what sites I visit?  Do I observe purity with myself and in relationships?  Am I working to acquire that virtue?  Will I admit that a disciple who follows the Lord should not choose cohabitation?  If married, am I married according to the sacrament in the Catholic Church?  What in my marriage, or what in the way I treat my spouse, does not reflect the type of sacrifice that is part of being a disciple?  Am I raising my children in the actual practice of the faith like I promised God on the day of their baptism?  Or is the family at Mass only when it is convenient or when it is a sacramental preparation year, when we expect our child to “get” something from the Church?  Do I support my child’s discovery of his vocation and do I encourage my child to consider the priesthood or religious life?  Do I have all the time in the world to know song lyrics and movie lines by heart but I’m far less saturated in God’s life-giving Word in the Bible?

I could go on and one with examples that indict both you and me.  The bottom line is this: What in my life is like Peter taking Jesus aside to rebuke him, telling him my terms for being a disciple?  Even if I say the right things about Jesus, like Peter did last week, what in my living of the faith is not in accord with dying to self and suffering to follow the Master and the narrow way that leads to blessing and eternal life?  This is the kind of self-reflection that needs to mark our lives.  And not just once, but constantly.  The Lord teaches us along with the apostles in the Gospel passage: “Whoever wishes to come after me must deny himself, take up his cross, and follow me.”  And he goes on to say, we will be repaid according to our conduct.  If we are trying to lead Jesus instead of follow him, then the repayment will not be pleasant.  My friends, this is not a light matter and the self-examination that needs to mark us is most serious.  Plenty of people can go astray, even if they don’t intend to, and even if we would consider them otherwise basically good people.  There is a risk that a person’s discipleship could be more something on the lips (what they say) while what they do shows them to be trying to lead the Lord rather than follow the Lord.  Just like the example of Peter, and whether it comes from among the ordained clergy, or the laity, or the consecrated religious, throughout the ages movements of disciples-in-name-only may call upon Jesus, “Lord, Lord!”, but they insist that Jesus be a different kind of Messiah, a different kind of Savior, one made in their own image and likeness.  This has happened throughout history.  In the first century, the Church was ravaged by a movement that rejected the divinity of Christ.  Even many bishops promoted that false teaching.  We are far less theologically sophisticated today, because now it is in vogue to make Jesus a Savior of inclusion and diversity who carries a pride flag instead of a cross.  It’s this Gospel passage playing out in 2023.  We can’t accept one part of discipleship (that is, the correct profession of faith) while rejecting the other (that is, living the right way).  Well, you can.  But you can’t do so while claiming to be a disciple of Jesus.  And if we attempt that false discipleship then we’d better get ready for a rebuke and a new name: “Get behind me, Satan!”